I posted this to both the RomanceNovels and the HistoricalFiction communities, because I figured people who read and write romance or historical novels might understand this romance-novel-hostile attitude in the rest of the world, and be sympathetic. It's really a complaint about the divide between genre fiction and literary fiction.
I wrote something unique: a bisexual historical romance. I’m very proud of this work. I think it’s intelligent and witty, with well-developed, sympathetic characters.
Because I’m unknown, and perhaps because it’s an unusual idea, I’ve had a hard time getting publicity and sales. But I also think I’m running up against the Curse of the Romance (Historical) Novel. Literate people don’t read them (they claim). Romance novels are just formulaic stories churned out like sausage by semi-literate cogs in the greasy wheels of Harlequin and other imprints for the even less literate consumers who gobble them up like animals at a trough. No reading, writing or imagination required.
I’m tired of the “Romance (Historical) novel equals trash” equation and I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore. ( Read more... )
I wrote something unique: a bisexual historical romance. I’m very proud of this work. I think it’s intelligent and witty, with well-developed, sympathetic characters.
Because I’m unknown, and perhaps because it’s an unusual idea, I’ve had a hard time getting publicity and sales. But I also think I’m running up against the Curse of the Romance (Historical) Novel. Literate people don’t read them (they claim). Romance novels are just formulaic stories churned out like sausage by semi-literate cogs in the greasy wheels of Harlequin and other imprints for the even less literate consumers who gobble them up like animals at a trough. No reading, writing or imagination required.
I’m tired of the “Romance (Historical) novel equals trash” equation and I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore. ( Read more... )
Current Mood:
aggravated
2 comments | Leave a comment
